Could MySpace Go The Way Of AOL?

March 9th, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

Portals are continuing to lose their once-dominant grip on the Internet ad industry.

A cursory review of AOL or Yahoo!’s growth makes the case as far as audience and revenue are concerned, but what about advertising? In Razofish’s new Digital Outlook Report we found that in 2008 share of our media spend on portals has shrunk to 16 percent from 19 percent, while search accounts for 37 percent.

The reason is that while the massive audiences like Yahoo or MSN delivers still matter, there are now a number of other viable options. In AdAge Abbey Klaassen suggests that you can now “think about targeting women at NBC Universal or Meredith sites or buying men at scale from a property such as ESPN.”

This chart depicts the Razorfish 2008 digital media spend

All of this got me thinking about the effects that social networking sites have had on the space and the future direction of MySpace and Facebook. At this juncture, it’s fairly clear that  MySpace is focused on becoming a portal itself — albeit a much more interactive one. The ad deal with Google, the reliance on display, and other forays have more similarities with Yahoo! and AOL than its often cited sibling Facebook. Of course MySpace is the only social network site to generate significant revenues and profits (so it’s not really an apples to apples comparison, is it?).

How will all this play out? Julia Angwin, who just recently released the book “Stealing MySpace: The Battle To Control The Most Popular Website in America”, gave a thought-provoking interview to I Want Media, “MySpace Could Become The Next AOL” and Wired recently.

In the I Want Media piece she lays out a compelling list of challenges for MySpace:

“MySpace needs to update its outdated features, such as its clunky blog software, and to match the functionality of Facebook’s news feed, which is the new gold standard for social networks. In a word, MySpace needs to catch up to Facebook technically. Users today won’t tolerate bulky old-fashioned interfaces for much longer.

But that won’t be enough. MySpace also needs to blaze new trails. It headed in the right direction when it partnered with Google to build a platform for widget makers. Another good move was when MySpace joined the OpenID movement. MySpace needs to keep seizing the lead and staying on the cutting edge.”

To that she might add more boldy exploring other revenue models outside of display. The move to become portal-esque was brilliant to generate revenue and find an internet model that worked. The MySpace platform is still the clear leader for musicians and celebrities to promote themselves and their work with widgets and brands is top notch. But the question, as always, is what’s next if not a portal?

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Banners Go Bust?: New Razorfish Report Finds Social Media Ad Spend Flattening

March 8th, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

Today Razorfish is releasing its 5th annual Digital Outlook Report. The goal of this jam-packed report is to help our clients better understand consumer behavior and make better-informed decisions on where to invest. The highlight, in my opinion, is always the the detailed look at where Razorfish makes digital advertising buys on behalf of our clients.

More simply, the Digital Outlook Report helps you follow the money to make sense of where the digital ad industry is headed.

This year Sarah Baehr, who leads our media practice for the agency, penned the report and it’s a doozy. The big takeway, at least for me, is the flattening ad spend in social media by big advertisers.

As Baehr points out, social media spending is essentially flat from ‘07 to ‘08. While MySpace and Facebook still account for the lionshare of the spend at 24%, the ad industry is clearly coming to terms with the fact that banner and other display don’t move the needle in the social sphere.

Call it a flight from banners, if you will, as marketers are definitely shifting their focus to integrating social media into everything they do online. The other way to look at this development as a flight to quality over quantity. Conventional wisdom has held that the explosion in ad inventory has depressed CPMs for publishers over the years. But clearly this is only one aspect, as savvy marketers are looking for better and more high quality “integration” opportunities as banners are proving less effective.

Sarah and Razorfish VP Terri Walter laid this out in detail to Henry Blodget’s Silicon Alley Insider recently in regard to the Gawker property consolidation:

  • Quit thinking about advertising as something that belongs on the periphery of your site. Package your unit as a “sponsorship.” Advertisers love to convey the feeling that your brilliant content is “brought to you by” their brand clients.  “Sponsorships will always be valuable,” said Terri.
  • Here’s are two words Terri and Sarah love to use: “Personalization” and “depth.”
  • A premium ad unit needs premium content (and a premium sales force to push it). Terri: “The publishers that are having problems are the ones that haven’t invested enough in their content or their ad sales team.”

This is just one of Sarah’s findings in this year’s Digital Outlook Report. Others include:

  • An increasing reliance on ROI and proven channels like search
  • A continued shift of budget away from portals
  • Renewed fragmentation in the ad network space
  • A big jump in spending in the entertainment category, where video and audio rules (Pandora saw a 142% increase alone last year)

Other must reads from the report include:

  • Razorfish CEO Clark Kokich on “From Breaking Campaigns to Building Client Businesses”
  • Shiv Singh on “Trends In Social Influence Marketing”
  • Paul Gelb on “Ten Mobile Applications To Watch”
  • Terri Walter on “The Digitalization of TV”

You can download the entire Digital Outlook Report here.

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Microsoft 2019

March 2nd, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

Microsoft’s Stephen Elop gave a pretty stunning look at the future, courtesy of Microsoft Labs, at the Wharton Business Technology Conference that’s getting a ton of press today. The video making the biggest splash follows:

Additional videos can be found here and Elop’s presentation can be downloaded here.

Outside of showcasing some fairly drool-worthy technology in a short video trailer, the presentation really draws attention to some of the interesting early thinking produced by the Microsoft Labs. I’ve always been a fan of Gary Flake’s stewardship of Live Labs, which has produced Photosynth, Seadragon and Thumbtack, among others, but this new initiative shows some deeper thinking by the Office Labs group that is more focused on productivity with work like this. Definitely worth a few minutes of your time to poke around and play with the prototypes.

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Beyond the iPhone: Early Razorfish Explorations in Designing Gestural Interfaces

February 27th, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

Until recently, the closest most of us got to experience gestural computing interfaces were in futuristic Hollywood films like Minority Report. But with the advent of the iPhone and Wii, gestural UI is now common place — and in its infancy. As Dan Saffer says in his book, “tap is the new click.”

At Razorfish, we’ve long been prototyping out gestural UIs for a number of devices and physical spaces. As of late, we’ve become increasingly excited by Microsoft’s Surface platform (and not just because they are our parent company). We believe that Surface, and other similar technologies, give us the ability to re-imagine everyday experiences on a grand scale — whether it be retail, social or play.

Below are a collection of videos, courtesy of our some of our Emerging Experience team (Jonathan Hull, Luke Hamilton, Steve Dawson and crew) of work we’ve done on the Surface platform for clients like AT&T (which is in stores now) and a number of other prototypes + concept work.


AT&T Retail Surface Experience from Razorfish - Emerging Experiences on Vimeo.


Microsoft Surface Financial Services Application - Razorfish Demo from Razorfish - Emerging Experiences on Vimeo.


Table Toss (Microsoft Surface Game) from Razorfish - Emerging Experiences on Vimeo.


Amnesia Razorfish - Staff Directory on Surface from Razorfish - Emerging Experiences on Vimeo.

Next up for us — Siftables (I hope!). You can see the demo below from TED. Can’t wait.

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

The Browser Wars Redux: Why Safari, Chrome, Firefox and IE Matter More Than Ever

February 25th, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

Two seemingly unrelated developments this week have convinced me that we are on the verge of a tectonic shift in “computing” — something that we may see realized in months rather than years.

The first item was “The Netbook Effect: How Cheap Little Laptops Hit The Big Time”, a brilliant piece on how netbooks have gone mainstream by Clive Thompson in this month’s Wired magazine. The second item was yesterday’s news of Apple’s release of the Safari 4 Beta which is more of a next-generation multi-media platform than a new “browser”.

In the Wired netbook piece, Thompson sketches out how Mary Lou Jepson unintentionally upended the entire PC industry (Dell, HP, Intel, Apple, etc.) by introducing a bottom-up design process where innovation didn’t originate on high, but from trying to design an ultra-cheap, ultra-portable laptop for students in developing countries. The spark: browser-based apps (via Google, Flickr, etc), nearly ubiquitos wifi, and a $300 price point are making traditional PCs and laptops nearly irrelevant.

Now almost all consumer computing is made possible “in the cloud” and is easily accessed via a browser, such as Firefox and nothing else. Choice quote:

“I wrote this story on a netbook, and if you had peeked over my shoulder, you would have seen precisely two icons on my desktop: the Firefox browser and a trash can. Nothing else. It turns out that about 95 percent of what I do on a computer can now be accomplished through a browser. I use it for updating Twitter and Facebook and for blogging. Meebo.com lets me log into several instant-messaging accounts simultaneously. Last.fm gives me tunes, and webmail does the email. I use Google Docs for word processing, and if I need to record video, I can do it directly from webcam to YouTube.”

Of course, once could argue that this is an early-adopter scenario — one that might be hastened by a low, low price-point. But for those of you who are trying out Apple’s Safari 4 Beta this week it’s easy to see how a browser-based future has already arrived.

The new Safari 4 is a multimedia tour de force that integrates some of iTunes gee whiz interaction elements like Cover Flow, into the browser in a very powerful way.

It doesn’t take much imagination to see how Safari 4 will enable Apple to seamlessly integrate iTunes, iPhoto and much more into the browser in a simple and elegant fashion. Host all of your media with MobileMe and the need for a powerful MacBook or desktop will fade away for most consumers. Pros will still need power, but Safari will become the OS for most of us sooner than later.

All of this points to a future where the browser becomes more important than ever. Google developed Chrome not to steal market share, but to own and optimize a platform for its robust browser based software like Google Docs, Google Apps and Gmail. Microsoft’s Internet Explorer, which has a slight lead in the category, gives the company a dominant platform for integrating its consumer and enterprise software, plus releasing new technologies like Silverlight. Finally, there’s Firefox, a former upstart that now rivals IE for share and introduced the concept of “Add-Ons” which turns the browser into a computing platform far more robust than merely “browsing” web pages.

The following stats, from CyberNet and NetApplications, paint a pretty compelling image of the evolution and coming battle:

It’s nothing new to say that the browser or search will become the future OS, but now it’s the time frame that has shifted rather dramatically. Couple these developments with ease of integrating advertising into the browser (and apps) and you’ve got a radically different future emerging in months, rather than years. And one that will have massive implications for all involved — especially publishers, advertisers and agencies, as these new platforms will call into question the desirability and effectiveness of traditional display advertising formats (banners, etc.) on mere websites. Sure, the revenue isn’t there yet, but it’s going to happen much sooner than most expect.

And ultimately,  all of this will be determined outside of the U.S., where netbooks will become the primary “computing” devices for most families. As Thompson notes, the next billion consumers are not coming from the U.S. but  “Brazil, Russia, India, China—where billions of very price-conscious customers have yet to buy their first computer. And the decisions they make—Windows or Linux? Microsoft wares or free cloud apps?—will have enormous influence on how computing evolves in the next few years.”

The future is about to get a lot more interesting — very soon — and the stakes are high for everyone.

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Disruptive Mobility Roundup: Mobile Banking Arrives, Plus Facebook’s Mobile Future

February 16th, 2009 by Kyle Outlaw

Bank of America iPhone App

Mobile banking is beginning to break in the US, if Bank of America’s recently published stats are any indication. According to Netbanker, 40% of Bank of America’s 2 million mobile bankers use iPhone or iPod Touch. Also 8 to 10% of mobile bankers signed up for the mobile service within 90 days of opening a BofA account. In a related article the Wall Street Journal reports on how improved technology is helping banks to attract customers despite the economic downturn…

Crunch Gear reports on details of a recent patent granted to Apple which describes a video conferencing application for the iPhone. According to the patent “an optical sensor is located on the front of the device so that the user’s image may be obtained for videoconferencing while the user views the other video conference participants on the touch screen display.” It’s worth noting that last year hackers Glen and Ken Aspeslagh actually beat Apple to the punch by creating their own videoconference application of their own using the iPhone’s speakerphone call and a mirror…

Six trends are conspiring to drive electronic books into the mainstream according to Mike Elgan at Computerworld. The article points out that despite the fact that Apple CEO Steve Jobs claims that “people don’t read any more”, the iPhone may yet prove to be a Kindle killer. Elgan also predicts that Apple will release a tablet, ideal for reading e-books. The Economist is on top of this trend with its article on the popularity of electronic books and what this could mean for newspapers, also Jeff Bezo’s Worst Nightmare…

Speculation in GigaOm that Facebook’s Future is Mobile. Om Malik writes “As we transition to an increasingly mobile world, the location beacon takes the role of the TCP, and most mobile services (and applications) find their context from this location beacon”. Malik prefers the iPhone version of Facebook to the web version, citing that the combination of the social graph and the phone’s address book make the mobile version more “socially relevant”.

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Google Puts Eye-tracking Back In Vogue?

February 10th, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

Wither the lowly usability specialist in the Web 2.0 era.

For the past few years we’ve all been “living in beta” and learning to “fail faster to succeed”. But in our rush to deploy new products and services to market — and then gauge their effectiveness with real audiences — traditional web usability testing has often been overlooked. Instead we opt for real-time data, click-tracking and the like. And for good reason.

But now Google, with it’s deeply provocative post on eye-tracking studies conducted for universal search (Eye-tracking studies: more than meets the eye), web usability may become hip again.

The Google team outlines how only eye-tracking could really help it understand the way users scan search results pages and make decisions, since the entire process is basically unconscious. The video alone is fascinating:

The results of their findings, excerpted below, enabled the team to add thumbnails with links to media with out harming the Google experience.

“The thumbnail image seemed to make results with thumbnails easy to notice when the users wanted them (see screenshots below — page with the thumbnail image on the right)…

Click the images to  view them larger.

…and the thumbnails also seemed to make it easy for people to skip over the results with thumbnails when those results were not relevant to their search (page with the thumbnail on the right).”

Classic web usability still proves effective after all of this time. Jakob Nielsen acolytes can rejoice. And maybe, just maybe, Google will help make usability testing become hip again.

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Top Ten Brands In Social Media

February 9th, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

I’ve been focusing on “Brands Do” and looking at how it specifically relates to social media over the last few days. One of the biggest tests is whether or not people actually discuss what a brand does. It’s a simple way to gauge impact.

This post, put together by Samir Balwani for Mashable, a insightful look at what he subjectively considers the top ten brands working in social media today. Refreshingly, he eschews studying the biggest brands for those that were actually most effective. In other words, it’s pretty much fluff-free and I agree with all of them.

The top ten includes:

  1. Blendtec Blends It on YouTube
  2. Burger King and The Sacrifice Application
  3. Starbucks Asks For Your Advice
  4. Sun Microsytems and The CEO blog
  5. IBM With Lots of Blogs
  6. Zappos on Twitter
  7. Comcast on Twitter Too
  8. Ford and Social Media PR
  9. Graco Uses Pictures on Flickr
  10. Dell Doing It Everywhere

Well worth a read.

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Free Food Trumps Leaping Lizards

February 4th, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

Denny’s won the post-Super Bowl buzz battle this week, as it’s free Grand Slam offer transcended typically glitzy, but so-so-ad offerings from SoBe, Budweiser’s Clydesdales and more. In a brilliant bit of forward thinking brand marketing, the chain restaurant created an event that allowed it to reconnect with customers and reinforce it’s “value” proposition.

It was spot on for the brand and clearly Denny’s struck a chord with a nation in the grips of a severe economic recession. People waited in long lines for 90 minutes or more, which made countless local TV news broadcasts, and the chain served more than 2 million customers.

I tend to think digital first (naturally) when I talk about how “actions speak louder than advertising.” But it’s clear that a holistic approach works best. The Denny’s giveaway made the most of traditional (TV, print) and digital. And the impact in the social sphere was noteworthy. Not only did Denny’s become one of the top trending topics on Twitter, but a surge in traffic brought down the chain’s website.

Now it will be interesting to see if the company can sustain and build on yesterday’s rekindled relationship with customers. Denny’s All-Nighter is a start and its TV commercials are clever, but there are more possibilities to make people part of the brand equation in the months ahead.

Super Bowl spot here:

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Escaping The Brand Management Trap

February 2nd, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

We would prefer to dial back on our paid media because word of mouth is the more effective way to reach people” said Chris Curtain, Vice President of Digital Strategy at Hewlett Packard, thereby sending a thousand social media evangelists hearts aflutter.

And, after watching the Super Bowl ad extravaganza tonight (where it’s all about brand building) it’s easier to understand why — big budgets, some memorable moments, but too many costly misfires.

Brands Do

Curtain, who made his remarks at OMMA Social in San Francisco this week, is one of the few forward thinking marketers (like Best Buy CMO Barry Judge) who are coming to realize that brands are solely no longer shaped by messaging or advertising, but by the actions they take with consumers. Now more than ever, it’s about what a brand does, not what it says.

We now live in a world where actions speak louder than advertising, but few organizations are ready to make the leap.

The Brand Management Trap

The reason finally dawned on me last week (in a bookstore of all places) when I realized that few marketers had the training to understand the tectonic shift that is occurring in the industry. For decades marketers have been taught to think of brand management as finding the optimal balance between “brand” and “product” (see below).

This way of thinking puts the emphasis on deciding how much to either “build brand” or “push product.” Typically this starts do drive decisions about the entire marketing ecosystem, including efforts around advertising, messaging, media spend, digital vs traditional, Superbowl spot or not?, etc.

Marketing’s Third Pillar: People

But this type of thinking is no longer as relevant in an era built on social interactions. Now marketers need consider a “third pillar” — people. As illustrated below, “people” is of equal importance as either “brand” or “product.”

Our definition of “people” includes both customers and employees. The most loyal customer (and employee) are the ones who are most heavily invested in the company.

Create a People Platform

Starbucks is a perfect example of a classic experience brand that is now adapting for a new era. Until recently, the company suffered as it pursued expansion over product, customer service and loyalty. MyStarbucksIdea.com, an online suggestion box and virtual community rolled into one, has started to move the company back towards its core DNA. They created a new “third place” with customers who voiced their feedback en masse. The result, Starbucks listened and acted with free Wifi, frequent purchaser drink cards, better food and even “splash sticks.”

Build a platform for customers to interact with your brand and each other, evolve products, vote on enhancements and earn rewards (see Zappos VIP Program) and you have the components of a brand that is set to thrive in this new participatory era.

CMOs Need To Act Now

My guess is that CMOs are already sensing this. In a recent AdAge article by Jack Neff, “Few CMOs Think They Are Effectively Tracking Social, Word-of-Mouth”, CMOs clearly are concerned that with all the talk about “listening” few companies really are and even worse, when they do listen they are unprepared to act:

“The survey of 400 executives found that 56% said their companies have no programs to track or propagate positive word-of-mouth; 59% don’t compensate any employees based on improvements in customer loyalty or satisfaction; and only 30% rated their companies highly in their ability to handle or resolve customer complaints.”

Neff continues:

“Despite all the hype about social media, only 16% of respondents said their companies have any routine system in place for monitoring what people are saying about them or their brands online.”

Embrace the “Participation Era”

The only way to prepare for a world in which actions speak louder than advertising is to invest in people platforms and services as much as companies invest in brand building and product marketing today. It’s time to fully embrace “people” as marketing’s third pillar.

We are starting to finally get the data to back this up. Last week Razorfish released rough data from several blinded client studies that suggest that social media is staggeringly more effective (4x) than paid placements. Further findings showed that wide distribution is key to driving engagement on a marketer’s core properties. While this is certainly early stuff, all roads point to the transformational power of co-creating experiences with real people.

As HP’s Curtain summized at OMMA Social, “if the only way you can generate interest in a product is to buy interest, you have a problem.”

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

*********************************************************

Special thanks to Joe Marchese who “tweeted” the OMMA Social Conference and Flickr users Maganite and Tonio888.

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

New Razorfish Data Ties Consumer Social Media Activity To Purchase Behavior

January 29th, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

How to make social media pay?

As our clients move more of their marketing spend to the social sphere, we have been amping up our efforts to understand the impact. We’ve always believed that “engagement” drives revenue, but it has been extremely difficult to quantify.

Finally, we think we may be a bit closer to cracking the nut. Today Razorfish is releasing findings from several client pilot programs (warts and all) that demonstrate how closely social activity correlate to purchase behavior.

The data, released by my colleague Marc Sanford, in a detailed white paper titled “Social Media Measurement: Widgets and Applications” finds that purchase behavior directly correlates to how deeply a consumer engages with a piece of social media *and* where they discover the media. Not surprisingly, referrals from friends (or influencers) are 4x more effective.

As Marc states “there are significant differences in both engagement and spend between those who discovered the application or widget through media, versus those who were referred by friends.  As shown below, those who discovered the application via a friend were almost four times more likely to download the applicationThey were also more likely to spend money on the client site and spent much more on average.”

The other major findings include how dramatically “engagement” effects page views and revenue. The following charts demonstrate that consumers who spend 5+ minutes with a widget spend significantly more time and view more page views on a given publisher’s web site. We found a similar impact on revenue, where engagement with a widget for 5+ minutes had large revenue upsides.

Clearly this early data reflects our belief that content distribution, especially among social networks, positively impacts a publisher’s monetizable web traffic — which helps explains why ESPN, Hulu, YouTube and the like put such effort into widget distribution. And this is also why retailers and manufactures, of which Amazon.com is clear leader, should be actively creating and distributing value-add widgets across social networks to drive revenue.

You can find the full report, which provides full detail (and data) on the two client programs here: “Social Media Measurement: Widgets and Applications”

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Citizen Connect: Early Explorations On How Digital Can Transform Democracy

January 27th, 2009 by Tim Richards

Ideologies aside, connecting to the political process can be a sticky proposition. What if working with your elected officials was more like Facebook? What if you were able to experience a personalized view of the gamut of political activity and it looked like Mint.com or Wii Fit?

Recently, I got semi-serious about trying to visualize what my ideal political platform (*snicker*) would look like. Why, with all the right information at my fingertips, I could “vote every day,” as it were. In any case, I’ve sketched a few concepts around why we consume the political ticker we do today — and what a citizen-centric system might look like. (Take a look at the original post over at my blog).

“Open Government” is not something I’m breaking here. No, it’s been put into action already – with the Citizen’s Briefing Book and widespread media coverage of it – and the administration’s disposition towards transparency. In fact, with President Obama’s recent memos and order related to the Freedom of Information Act, we can only expect to see more of this.

Now, the sketches in progress here aspire to be more than an implementation of MyStarbucksIdea for the President. So, I am looking for more models out there in the world where this is working. Where is government utilizing social/transparent platforms to connect constituents to the issues? What’s next for government?

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Social Networks Will Be Like Air

January 23rd, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

Charlene Li, a former Forrester Analyst and co-author of Groundswell who has a new business called the Altimeter Group, gave a thought provoking presentation for the San Francisco AMA on the future of social networks.

Essentially, she sketched out a scenario where “social networks will be like air” and open networks will come to define business moving forward. Clearly Facebook Connect, which scored a coup this week by partnering with CNN for the Obama Inauguration, weighs heavily in her thinking. As do the current declines in graphical advertising and false starts on social network ad formats. Good stuff:

Presentation below:

**

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

The Evolution of Brand Management

January 22nd, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

Dave Knox, who writes the blog Hard Knox Life, recently sent around this witty video created by German ad agency Scholz & Friend. Definitely worth a look:

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

How Crowds Work: Moving Beyond Forrester’s Social Technographics Ladder

January 14th, 2009 by Garrick Schmitt

Tim Richards, who leads the Razorfish Experience Design practice in LA and writes the Experience Foo blog, is reexamining our assumptions about how crowds work. First up: an evolution of Forrester’s famous Social Technographics Ladder, created by Charlene Li and Josh Bernoff:

Tim takes the Charlene and Josh’s concept a step further, literally, and puts the Forrester Social Technographics ladder on its side and in the middle of an actual crowd. His goal is to rethink participatory behavior in context of a particular community or topic of interest (click for full-res).

From Experience Foo:

Crowds, Markets, Conversations, Tribes, Organizations without organization…there’s plenty of speculation and related ruckus in the market, as social media gets more and more attention in traditional PR circles (and vice versa). Great little book by Seth Godin about Tribes…not related to Crowds in this sense; it’s more about Leading From Where You Stand – and doing what you love (yeah, it gets a little preachy).

I’m talking about Crowds in a sense of topical relevance; a crowd is a group of folks that are actively taking interest in a specific topic. Near the center of the crowd, you might find the Elite – people making, creating, thinking, dreaming…putting “art” into the market, relevant to their crowd. A crowd may be assembled around nearly any topic; Robotics, Skateboarding, Current Political Events, or Kittens.

Skill and knowledge that’s native to the topic are highest in the center. Spanning out from the center of the crowd, you’ll find decreasing expertise and knowledge (and interest) in the topic. The more specific the topic, the smaller the crowd, probably. The more inclusive and expansive the topic, the larger the crowd…and more difficult it might be to find the center.

Here’s something you’re probably familiar with: The Forrester NACTAS “Social Technographics Ladder” thing. Here, I’ve put it on it’s side, and put it in the context of a crowd. I’m interested in how folks interact in the crowd. I am interested in the activities of a crowd, based on topic.

Here’s the thing about that Forrester chart…it’s only kind of right. It describes people across the board as “Creators” - when, in reality, I’m a creator only in respect to a few topics…not everything. So, how do I, as a person…and as a brand, go about understanding the roles that people play in specific topics (NOT markets)? I think observation of crowds, and the dynamics at work there will help understand how ideas flow through crowds.

This ladder on its side only plots behaviors. I’m going to work on visualizing the dynamics between the divisions of crowd members – and mobility from one group to another.

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Reinventing Comics on the iPhone OS

January 13th, 2009 by Kyle Outlaw

Comics aficionados can now enjoy a handful of new applications available at the iTunes App Store.

L’homme de Washington is the latest edition from the popular French/Belgian comic series Lucky Luke. For those not familiar with the character, Lucky Luke is the creation of cartoonist Maurice De Bevere (aka ‘Morris’) and writer René Goscinny, who also collaborated on the Asterix graphic novels. Lucky Luke is a perpetually smoking, Clint Eastwood-esque cowboy who has adventures involving famous historical characters of the American West including Billy the Kid, the Dalton Brothers, among others.

The application itself was developed by Ave!Comics, a French design firm. The UI controls have been translated into English and French, although the comic text itself is only in French at this time. Features include full support of multi-touch gestures and the 47-page comic is viewable in portrait or landscape mode. Ave!Comics has created an innovative approach to viewing comics by mobile and this application will likely serve as a new bench mark for interactive comics.

Another interesting comic now available for the iPhone is Jeff Smith’s six-volume series Bone published by UClick. Hailed by Time Magazine as one of the Top Ten Graphic Novels of All Time, the series can be roughly described as something in between Walt Disney and J.R.R. Tolkien. Features include screens and panels optimized for the iPhone and easy-to-use gestural controls. Other notables include Scott Meyers’ Basic Instructions, and Richard Starkings’ Elephantmen, also published by UClick.

The iPhone and various emerging netbook platforms are particularly well-suited for downloading and reading interactive comics, and some of the potential for comics afforded by new media that comics theorist Scott McCloud has been talking about for some time may finally be realized. In Reinventing Comics, the sequel to Understanding Comics: the Invisible Art, McCloud proposed that new media would lead to a renaissance for the fledgling medium. It will be interesting to see how this new platform catches on with comics creators and their fans, particularly as social networking, messaging, and maybe even location-awareness get thrown in the mix. [Via Textually, iTunes Apps Store]

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Teaching Experience Design @ MIT: From Product Design to Problem Solving

January 12th, 2009 by Marisa Gallagher

Razorfish is going back to school this week. MIT to be exact. One of our Senior Interaction Designers, Nadya Direkova, and I are teaching a 3-day course at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology this week, as part of the school’s annual Independent Activities Period (IAP) between semesters.

Follow along with us - we’ll be posting updates here on the Digital Design Blog and via twitter @ http://twitter.com/marisagallagher.

The course is centered around the idea that Experience Design begins with product design but ultimately is about solving problems. We’re planning to use a small set of lectures and a lot of (Nadya’s tremendous) learning exercises to bring the following structure to life:

  • Day 1 - Exploring Fundamental Design Tools + Methods: Having fun and playing games with sitemaps, wireframes, engagement maps, storyboards, and qualitative + quantitative research.
  • Day 3 (half day) - Envisioning the Future + Solving Problems: Hosting classwide (the students and us) presentations of digital trends we’re excited to see, then finishing up with exercises and discussion about the problems our students want to solve - today and in the future - and how Experience Design can help them do that.

- What do you think?

- What would you want to learn or discuss in a 3-day seminar?

- What do you think a group of MIT, Harvard, and Tuft students will be most interested to delve into during their exploratory January term?

- What types of wonderful accidents and strange surprises do you think might arise?

And a huge thank you to the following folks for all your help with the class materials and you’re willingness to play a bunch of funny games with us: Garrick Schmitt, Shiv Singh, Amy Vickers, Susan Charette, Julia Debari, Patricia Witkin, Craig Prehn, Reggie Wirjadi, Andrew Milmoe, Sarah Murgel, Lilia Manguy, and Carrice Delo.

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Brands Do.

January 8th, 2009 by Malia Supe and Garrick Schmitt

‘Tis the season for forecasts and predictions, but one thing we can certain about in 2009 and beyond is that our thinking about brands must change.

We know that the consumer landscape has been radically altered by search, social media, online video and the like. But most significantly we are witnessing the emergence of a participatory culture — one that’s impact is just starting to be felt.

But many companies, while aware of the shift, are still struggling to participate in meaningful ways themselves. Some have definitely done well (Nike, Dell, for sure) but it becomes a  nightmare (e.g. Motrin Moms et al, from Jeremiah Owyang) for others.

If anything, this shift should serve as a wake-up call for marketers and advertisers. They need to find meaningful ways for their brands to participate, as well –- but not in the traditional manner of pushing tired old messages at consumers.  No, today, brands need to build strength through action.

Actions Speak Louder Than Advertising

What we as consumers really want is for brands to stop marketing and start doing. My colleagues and I at Razorfish believe that for brands to be successful in this environment they need to stand for something and “do” something.

What a brand says will always be important, but in this day and age what a brand does – how it acts and how it brings its beliefs to life in ways that add value to consumers — will be the most important, and ultimately the most engaging.

Our goal then, as a digital agency, is to help create real, tangible expressions of our clients’ brands and make them meaningful to consumers.

Rethinking Our Relationships With Brands

When we think back on the relationships we have with brands, it seems that the ones that run deep are the ones where we are emotionally or rationally invested in the brand. Whether it is a running shoe, a favorite beer or even a hotel chain, there are some brands that matter to us and that we choose time and time again. The reasons for our loyalty differ and in some cases the relationship is built over time through experience while in others it is love at first sight. But for today’s marketers creating loyalty or even preference with consumers is a difficult task – one that is increasingly challenging .

Finding The White Space

The sheer number of brands vying for attention is overwhelming.  Old brands, new brands, celebrity brands, corporate brands and even country brands are all hawking products that in many ways are very similar to products we have already seen and may already have. Marketers keep trying to drive differentiation for products (that are often at parity) with messages we have all heard before.

Digital has also made marketing more complex. For one, it has splintered broad, traditional and easy to navigate channels into micro channels or micro interactions that are built for people not advertisers and their ads. Digital has also fundamentally changed how we view media. It is no longer a channel but rather an entity in itself - something we don’t just watch or read but create, participate in, or share with others.

And lastly, influencers are everywhere – disrupting the most holy of conversations – the one between consumers and the brand. These influencers are impossible to control (much less influence) because they are everywhere and everything and they aren’t necessarily consumers – they are media, other brands, products, design, culture — all the fluid forces that surround the world in which the brand lives.

Becoming a Brand of Action, Not Words

So what’s a brand to do?  Start taking action, now.  Here are a few examples:

Zappos.com

The company has built itself on customer service and non-traditional marketing tactics. For example, reportedly half of the company is active on Twitter, CEO Tony Hsieh blogs consistently, and the company earns raves for making its culture its brand. But it’s the service that really kills: free overnight shipping and a very generous return policy make Zappos a brand of actions, not just words.

Nike

There have been no shortage of hosannas heaped upon Nike for its Nike+ and Running work — and deservedly so. This past year’s Human Race, where Nike hosted a worldwide running race for its best and future customers, was pure genius. Nike is showing how a truly modern brand can and should behave: part party planner, part community organizer and ultimately a provider of indispensable products.

Camper

Camper is a quirky brand. While most of us in the U.S. think of it as a shoe brand, the Spanish company is much more and pursues a belief system focused on a slower, healthier lifestyle. Proof: Casa Camper, a stylish (though laid back) hotel in Barcelona that is tangible manifestation of the brand — one that is well beyond a product or retail experience.

Virgin

Richard Branson’s Virgin is the classic branding case study. And for good reason, the company is amazingly scalable allowing the company to bring its maverick brand to industries like travel, finance and mobile phones. Virgin America is the latest example — a complete rethink of the air travel experience. What a novel concept to actually order food and beverages on a plane!

Starbucks

Starbucks is the classic experience brand, but until recently, suffered as it pursued expansion over customer service and loyalty. That all changed with MyStarbucksIdea.com, an online suggestion box and virtual community rolled into one. The company wasn’t the first to roll out a service like this (and did so haltingly at first) but it clearly resonated as a new “third place” with customers who voiced their feedback en masse. The result, Starbucks listened and acted. Free Wifi, frequent purchaser drink cards, better food, coffee lid swizzle stick thingamajigs and more.

Here’s How To Act Now

1. Define. Define what your brand really stands for. What are the core beliefs that will drive how your brand interacts with the world? Unless you understand that and your brand’s core DNA, it’s nearly impossible to take meaningful action.

2. Identify. Start to identify the behaviors or actions that match these beliefs. What’s truly authentic to the brand? For example, if your company sells software do you really want to open a wine bar?

3. Audit. Audit all of your current marketing efforts, both online and off. Is there a disconnect between how you want the brand to behave and how it is currently behaving? You can’t build a brand around customer service when customers can’t reach support staff, for example. Or, does that ad in “O” magazine really express the dynamic quality of your brand?

4. Listen. This is truly the key. Great brands are built on what people say about you, not what you say about yourself. Go beyond the obvious and start talking with customers. At minimum monitor their actions across the social sphere on gathering places like Twitter, Facebook, et al. Then react.

5. Make Your Brand Tangible. The final step is to create a tangible expression of your brand. What should your brand do? Where should it go? What should it say, what are  the products and services that a brand with this belief system would create? Five or 10 years ago this would have exclusively meant a physical product, but today digital experiences provide real value for consumers. For a financial institution, it may mean offering a service like Mint. For a consumer packaged goods brand, it may mean creating a means for a specific community (say Moms) to interact.

For us, ‘09 will be about actions speaking louder than advertising. What about you?

*********************************************************

Special thanks for help/inspiration and conversation: Brandon Geary, Joe Crump, Marisa Gallagher, Tim Richards, Shiv Singh, Jeff Lanctot, Colin Kinsella, Clark Kokich and David Deal.

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Moving to Twitter Thru the Holidays, Back to Blogging in January

December 21st, 2008 by Garrick Schmitt

Blog posts will be light thru the holidays (at best), but I will be back at it the first week of January. Until then we can continue the conversation on Twitter (yes, I am smitten with with it). You can follow me here:http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Happy holidays!

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit

Razorfish Sees Solid Growth for Social Network Ad Spending; eMarketer Not So Much

December 18th, 2008 by Garrick Schmitt

eMarketer is out with a very comprehensive, semi-gloomy report on the future of Social Network Ad Spending this week. Written by Debra Aho Williams, the report finds that despite the introduction of significant new ad formats, eMarketer is revising down spending estimates for 2008 (to a 10.2% uptick), due to an ailing US economy and slower-than-expected revenue growth at MySpace.

At Razorfish, we are more bullish. Jeff Lanctot, who heads up corporate strategy for Razorfish, was interviewed extensively for the report and data from FEED: The Razorfish Consumer Experience Report was prominently featured.

As Jeff explained, many of our clients (such as Victoria’s Secret, Coors and Levi Strauss & Co.) are increasing social network ad spending:

Our combined spending on MySpace and Facebook was up 32%, Q2 over Q1. Q3 was up an additional 22%. We don’t have enough data this quarter to say how Q4 will turn out, but the trend to date has clearly been strong growth.”

Jeff went on to discuss the success of Victoria’s Secret PINK which is one of the top brand draws on Facebook with over 580,000 fans and continues to use the service to make meaningful connections with the teen/college audience.

Additionally, Razorfish is finding that social network advertising is becoming a staple of today’s ad campaigns. “Some of those bigger brand campaigns [on social  networks] have become staples of our clients’ campaigns,  and they are considered accountable and will continue in a downturn, Jeff said. “The way the movie studios look at MySpace when they’re releasing a movie targeted to the younger demo—it is absolutely a critical part of the rollout of their movie, quite frankly, the way that MSN or Yahoo! were three or four years ago.

The eMarketer study also cites two key findings from our Connected Consumer Study:

Ultimately, the eMarketer report is one of the best out there on the state of social media and advertising. Beyond the Razorfish data, there’s great bits on top Facebook pages, social consumer behavior, fastest growing social network sites and interesting viewpoints from AKQA, among others.

As the year wraps up, it will be interesting to see where other agencies and marketers are tracking for 2008. We hope, up.

*********************************************************

We can continue the conversation on Twitter and in the comments below. You can follow me here:

http://www.twitter.com/gschmitt

Del.icio.us     Digg     Technorati     Share on Facebook     Stumble Upon     Google Bookmarks     Furl     reddit